Zum Inhalt springen
Zerotoinvest
DEEN

Momentum and trend following

Securities that recently did well kept outperforming on average over the following months. The effect is well documented, but comes with sharp drawdowns and weakens once it becomes known.

2 min read Last checked: 2026-09-05

Momentum's basic idea is about as simple as it gets: securities that rose more than average over the last three to twelve months keep rising more than average, on average, over the following months. And the reverse: whatever recently performed weakly tends to keep performing weakly.

This is one of the most thoroughly studied patterns in all of finance research. Economists Narasimhan Jegadeesh and Sheridan Titman showed in 1993 that a strategy buying recent strong stocks and short-selling recent weak ones earned a clear excess return over their study period. The finding has since been replicated in most stock markets worldwide and in other asset classes.

A related but different variant is trend following, where what counts isn't the comparison between securities, but a single market's own price direction. A study by AQR Capital Management found positive results for trend-following strategies across stocks, bonds, commodities, and currencies in nearly every decade since 1880.

The effect has an unpleasant flip side. Momentum strategies occasionally suffer very sharp, brief drawdowns, for instance when a market abruptly reverses after a crisis. Hold the trend too long against an already-occurring reversal, and you can lose a substantial share of years of accumulated excess return within a few weeks.

Why momentum doesn't last forever. Cumulative profit of a momentum strategy, per Jegadeesh and Titman (2001). The edge grows until month 12 and then unwinds. 01224364860 cumulative profit Months since portfolio formation +12.2% after 12 months −0.4% after 60 monthszerotoinvest.com
Why momentum doesn't last forever Cumulative profit of a momentum strategy, per Jegadeesh and Titman (2001). The edge grows until month 12 and then unwinds.

Summary

  • Recently strong securities kept outperforming on average over the following months.
  • The effect is documented across decades and many markets, but not risk-free.
  • Momentum strategies occasionally suffer sharp drawdowns, especially during recovery phases after crises.

Did you get it?

What did Jegadeesh and Titman show in 1993?

That a strategy buying past winners and selling past losers earned a clear excess return over three to twelve months.

What is a momentum crash?

A sharp, brief drawdown of momentum strategies, typically occurring during recovery phases after market crises.

Which two camps face off in explaining the momentum effect?

Behavioral explanations citing delayed reactions and feedback, and risk-based explanations citing higher systematic risk in past winners.

Sources and further reading

  • Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (1993), Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers, Journal of Finance
  • Jegadeesh, N. and Titman, S. (2001), Profitability of Momentum Strategies, Journal of Finance View source ↗
  • Hurst, B., Ooi, Y. H. and Pedersen, L. H. (2017), A Century of Evidence on Trend-Following Investing, AQR Capital Management View source ↗

Related